MediaTek MT6575 vs MediaTek MT6572

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 vs MediaTek MT6572, speed examination of GPUs PowerVR SGX531 and Mali-400.

This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6575 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A9) and MT6572 is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Geekbench, PCMark, 3DMark, Octane V2, Vellamo, Neocore, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, and how good the chips are in games PUBG, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Sniper 3D etc.

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy MT6575 or MT6572 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6575

MT6572

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6575

-4%

MT6572

22%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6575

MT6572

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6575	MT6572
Total score	10235	13149
CPU	2875	3687
GPU	3891	4987
MEM	1627	2094
UX	1834	2366

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6575	MT6572
Single-Core	27	34
Multi-Core	125	160

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6575	MT6572
Frequency	1000 MHz	1200 MHz
Cores	1	2
Bit	32	32
Lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A9	2x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	0.5 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency	266	266
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6572 is 16% better than MT6575 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6575 has 1 more core than MT6572. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR SGX531	Mali-400
GPU Frequency	216 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	2.24	4.5
# of Cores	1	1
# of Shader Units
Display	840 x 480 pixels	960 x 540 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	1.8	3.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	7.5	9.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	3.6	5.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	3.1	4.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	5.9	7.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	9.1	12.1
Real Racing 3	7.2	7.1
Sniper 3D	5.8	12.5
Need for Speed No Limits	6.5	8
Mortal Kombat X	4.1	7.4
CSR Racing 2	4.7	6.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	5 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	HD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6575 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6572 is better: 25
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6575 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6575 specs and review.

MT6572 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6572 specs and review.