 |
Rockchip RK3562 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F |
|
Comparisons 17-10-2023 Comprehensive comparison data of Rockchip RK3562 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Geekbench, AnTuTu, PCMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, GFXBench, Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, and how good the chipsets are in games GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite, Madout2 etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy Rockchip RK3562 or Kirin 710F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreRockchip RK3562 | 11% |
Kirin 710F | 9% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Rockchip RK3562 | 52% |
Kirin 710F | 62% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingRockchip RK3562 | 9% |
Kirin 710F | 6% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3562 |
Kirin 710F | Total score | 153859 | 132067 | CPU | 43076 | 36974 | GPU | 58462 | 50180 | MEM | 24625 | 21140 | UX | 27698 | 23762 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3562 |
Kirin 710F | Single-Core | 403 | 270 | Multi-Core | 1208 | 1188 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3562 |
Kirin 710F | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 6 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 933 | Memory bandwidth | 16 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 710F is 9% better than Rockchip RK3562 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Rockchip RK3562 has 4 more core than Kirin 710F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Mali-G71 MP4 | GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 950 MHz | GFloPS | 404 | 169 | # of Cores | 2 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 24.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 29.8 | 48.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 45.4 | 60.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 39.4 | 27.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 28.4 | 42.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 39.4 | 62.4 | Real Racing 3 | 56.6 | 75.9 | Sniper 3D | 71.8 | 115.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 71.8 | 97.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 72.1 | 78.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 59.8 | 85 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3562 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710F is better: 23 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Rockchip RK3562 SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Kirin 710F SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Snapdragon 720G • Vs Snapdragon 730G • Vs Tiger T618 • Vs Helio G80 • Vs Exynos 9810 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
| |
|