 |
Kirin 710F vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, compare of GPUs Adreno 530 and Mali-G71 MP4. This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 710F is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro is quad-core (Kryo 280). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software like Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, GFXBench, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, 3DMark, Geekbench, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, and how good the chips are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat etc. After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy Kirin 710F or Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreKirin 710F | 9% |
Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro | 10% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 710F | 62% |
Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro | 54% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingKirin 710F | 6% |
Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro | 9% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 710F |
Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro | Total score | 132067 | 149901 | CPU | 36974 | 41975 | GPU | 50180 | 56961 | MEM | 21140 | 23984 | UX | 23762 | 26987 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 710F |
Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro | Single-Core | 270 | 306 | Multi-Core | 1188 | 1349 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 710F |
Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2400 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 280 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 11 W | Memory type | LPDDR3x | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 6 Gb | Memory Frequency | 933 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | | 29.8 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB | L2 cache | 512 KB | 3 MB | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro is 8% better than Kirin 710F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Kirin 710F has -4 more core than Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G71 MP4 | Adreno 530 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 169 | 518.73 | # of Cores | 4 | | # of Shader Units | | 256 | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 24.8 | 27.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 48.1 | 26.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 60.7 | 53.8 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 27.4 | 28.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 42.8 | 21.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 62.4 | 37.2 | Real Racing 3 | 75.9 | 94.2 | Sniper 3D | 115.3 | 69.9 | Need for Speed No Limits | 97.1 | 64.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 78.9 | 78 | CSR Racing 2 | 85 | 59.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 28 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 8 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710F is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro is better: 21 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Kirin 710F and Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Kirin 710F SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Snapdragon 720G • Vs Snapdragon 730G • Vs Tiger T618 • Vs Helio G80 • Vs Exynos 9810 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|