Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 benchmark which processor is better

Kirin 710F vs Snapdragon 460

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G71 MP4 and Adreno 610.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 710F is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Snapdragon 460 is octa-core (Kryo 240). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, GFXBench, 3DMark, Octane V2, and how good the processors are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, PUBG etc.

   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Kirin 710F or Snapdragon 460 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.


 
HiSilicon Kirin 710F
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Kirin 710F9% Snapdragon 46010%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Kirin 710F62% Snapdragon 46069%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Kirin 710F6% Snapdragon 4608%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Kirin 710F Snapdragon 460
Total score132067142955
CPU3697440022
GPU5018054316
MEM2114022868
UX2376225725

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Kirin 710F Snapdragon 460
Single-Core270292
Multi-Core11881286

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Kirin 710F Snapdragon 460
Frequency2200 MHz1800 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography12 nm11 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73
4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
8x1.8 GHz Kryo 240
Power consumption (TDP)5 W3 W
Memory typeLPDDR3xLPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory6 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency9331866
Memory bandwidth13.91
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache256 KB
L2 cache512 KB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8.3-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 710F is 18% better than Snapdragon 460 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G71 MP4Adreno 610
GPU Frequency950 MHz750 MHz
GFloPS169312
# of Cores4
# of Shader Units192
Display1920 x 1080 pixels2520 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile24.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)48.128.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra60.740.1
Call of Duty: Mobile27.437.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)42.827.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition62.440.2
Real Racing 375.970.2
Sniper 3D115.388.2
Need for Speed No Limits97.172.2
Mortal Kombat X78.964.2
CSR Racing 28548.1
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution16 MP48 MP
Dual Camera resolution8 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 340
Video Encoding FPS3060
Video Encoding resolutionFullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon X11 LTE modem
Download speed300 MBit/s.390 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGLONASS, NavIC, QZSS, GPS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710F is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 is better: 22
   Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Kirin 710F SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
Snapdragon 460 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10


Kirin 710F SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710A
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Exynos 9609
• Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Helio P70
• Vs Snapdragon 670
• Vs Snapdragon 665
• Vs Exynos 9611
• Vs Exynos 9610
• Vs Kirin 970
• Vs Helio P60
• Vs Helio P90
• Vs Helio P95
• Vs Snapdragon 675
• Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Snapdragon 662
• Vs Snapdragon 710
• Vs Helio G70
• Vs Exynos 880
• Vs Snapdragon 712
• Vs Snapdragon 730
• Vs Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Tiger T618
• Vs Helio G80
• Vs Exynos 9810
• Vs Kirin 710
• Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Helio G35
• Vs SC9863A
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000


Snapdragon 460 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands