HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 benchmark which processor is better

Kirin 710F vs Snapdragon 662

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 610 and Mali-G71 MP4.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Kirin 710F is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Snapdragon 662 is octa-core (Kryo 260). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, PCMark, Octane V2, Geekbench, Vellamo, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, even the gaming performance of processors in Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Fortnite, Sniper 3D etc.

After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy Kirin 710F or Snapdragon 662 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 710F

Snapdragon 662

13%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 710F

62%

Snapdragon 662

68%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 710F

Snapdragon 662

10%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 710F	Snapdragon 662
Total score	132067	182816
CPU	36974	51179
GPU	50180	69479
MEM	21140	29244
UX	23762	32900

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 710F	Snapdragon 662
Single-Core	270	374
Multi-Core	1188	1573

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 710F	Snapdragon 662
Frequency	2200 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	11 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	8x2.0 GHz Kryo 260
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR3x	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	6 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	933	1866/933
Memory bandwidth		13.91
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	256 KB
L2 cache	512 KB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 710F is 9% better than Snapdragon 662 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G71 MP4	Adreno 610
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	750 MHz
GFloPS	169	312
# of Cores	4
# of Shader Units		192
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	24.8	24.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	48.1	29.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	60.7	61.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	27.4	32.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	42.8	25.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	62.4	35.2
Real Racing 3	75.9	92.3
Sniper 3D	115.3	98.4
Need for Speed No Limits	97.1	86.1
Mortal Kombat X	78.9	80
CSR Racing 2	85	86.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	48 MP
Dual Camera resolution	8 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 340T
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem		Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	390 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710F is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is better: 23
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Kirin 710F and Snapdragon 662, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Kirin 710F SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Kirin 710F specs and review.

Snapdragon 662 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 662 specs and review.