HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 benchmark which processor is better

Kirin 710F vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G71 MP4 and Mali-T880 MP12.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Kirin 710F is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is octa-core (Exynos Mongoose). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software like Octane V2, PCMark, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, GFXBench, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of processors in Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Kirin 710F or Exynos 8 Octa 8890 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 710F

Exynos 8 Octa 8890

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 710F

62%

Exynos 8 Octa 8890

54%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 710F

Exynos 8 Octa 8890

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 710F	Exynos 8 Octa 8890
Total score	132067	123350
CPU	36974	34536
GPU	50180	46875
MEM	21140	19745
UX	23762	22212

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 710F	Exynos 8 Octa 8890
Single-Core	270	252
Multi-Core	1188	1110

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 710F	Exynos 8 Octa 8890
Frequency	2200 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.3 GHz Exynos Mongoose 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3x	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	6 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	933	1866
Memory bandwidth		26.82
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	256 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	2 MB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is 4% better than Kirin 710F in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G71 MP4	Mali-T880 MP12
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	169	265
# of Cores	4	12
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	24.8	24.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	48.1	47.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	60.7	50.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	27.4	26.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	42.8	43.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	62.4	61.7
Real Racing 3	75.9	75.6
Sniper 3D	115.3	80.6
Need for Speed No Limits	97.1	80.6
Mortal Kombat X	78.9	58
CSR Racing 2	85	70.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution	8 MP	24 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	60
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.12/13 2/3 CA
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710F is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is better: 15
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Kirin 710F and Exynos 8 Octa 8890, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Kirin 710F SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Kirin 710F specs and review.

Exynos 8 Octa 8890 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Exynos 8 Octa 8890 specs and review.