 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs HiSilicon Kirin 970, compare of GPUs Mali-G72 MP12 and Mali-G71 MP4. This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 710F is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Kirin 970 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications such as Geekbench, Octane V2, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, GFXBench, Neocore, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Kirin 710F or Kirin 970 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreKirin 710F | 9% |
Kirin 970 | 11% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 710F | 62% |
Kirin 970 | 64% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 710F |
Kirin 970 | Total score | 132067 | 160216 | CPU | 36974 | 44870 | GPU | 50180 | 60875 | MEM | 21140 | 25631 | UX | 23762 | 28844 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 710F |
Kirin 970 | Single-Core | 270 | 328 | Multi-Core | 1188 | 1379 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 710F |
Kirin 970 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2400 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR3x | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 933 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | | 29 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 256 KB | 512 KB | L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 970 is 8% better than Kirin 710F in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G71 MP4 | Mali-G72 MP12 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 169 | 346 | # of Cores | 4 | 12 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 24.8 | 20.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 48.1 | 24.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 60.7 | 53.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 27.4 | 27.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 42.8 | 21.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 62.4 | 30.3 | Real Racing 3 | 75.9 | 106.8 | Sniper 3D | 115.3 | 85.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 97.1 | 64.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 78.9 | 77.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 85 | 64.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 20 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 8 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | 18 | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 1200 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710F is better: 14
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 970 is better: 22 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Kirin 710F and Kirin 970, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Kirin 710F SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Snapdragon 720G • Vs Snapdragon 730G • Vs Tiger T618 • Vs Helio G80 • Vs Exynos 9810 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
Kirin 970 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|