MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F benchmark which processor is better

Helio X27 (MT6797X) vs Kirin 710F

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G71 MP4 and Mali-T880 MP4.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Helio X27 (MT6797X) is deca-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Kirin 710F is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Octane V2, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Geekbench, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Neocore, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock etc.

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Helio X27 (MT6797X) or Kirin 710F and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Helio X27 (MT6797X)

Kirin 710F

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Helio X27 (MT6797X)

41%

Kirin 710F

62%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Helio X27 (MT6797X)

Kirin 710F

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Helio X27 (MT6797X)	Kirin 710F
Total score	98106	132067
CPU	27468	36974
GPU	37277	50180
MEM	15689	21140
UX	17655	23762

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Helio X27 (MT6797X)	Kirin 710F
Single-Core	253	270
Multi-Core	1142	1188

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Helio X27 (MT6797X)	Kirin 710F
Frequency	2600 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	10	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	20 nm	12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Dual Channel)	LPDDR3x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	6 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	933
Memory bandwidth	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	256 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X27 (MT6797X) is 15% better than Kirin 710F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Helio X27 (MT6797X) has -2 more core than Kirin 710F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T880 MP4	Mali-G71 MP4
GPU Frequency	875 MHz	950 MHz
GFloPS	118.91	169
# of Cores	4	4
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		24.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	21.8	48.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	37.8	60.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	24.3	27.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	18.6	42.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.4	62.4
Real Racing 3	75.6	75.9
Sniper 3D	60.5	115.3
Need for Speed No Limits	68	97.1
Mortal Kombat X	60.5	78.9
CSR Racing 2	52.9	85

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	16 MP
Dual Camera resolution		8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) is better: 9
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710F is better: 27
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Helio X27 (MT6797X) and Kirin 710F, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Helio X27 (MT6797X) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Helio X27 (MT6797X) specs and review.

Kirin 710F SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Kirin 710F specs and review.