Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F, speed examination of GPUs Adreno 510 and Mali-G71 MP4.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Kirin 710F is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Vellamo, PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Neocore, PCMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, and how good the processors are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 or Kirin 710F and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976

Kirin 710F

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976

25%

Kirin 710F

62%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976

Kirin 710F

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 652 MSM8976	Kirin 710F
Total score	82688	132067
CPU	23162	36974
GPU	31412	50180
MEM	13222	21140
UX	14875	23762

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 652 MSM8976	Kirin 710F
Single-Core	214	270
Multi-Core	963	1188

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 652 MSM8976	Kirin 710F
Frequency	1800 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)		5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)	LPDDR3x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	6 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866	933
Memory bandwidth	14.9
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	256 KB	256 KB
L2 cache		512 KB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 710F is 18% better than Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 510	Mali-G71 MP4
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	950 MHz
GFloPS	176	169
# of Cores		4
# of Shader Units	128
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		24.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	15.7	48.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	28.6	60.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	16.2	27.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	12.6	42.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	15.6	62.4
Real Racing 3	42.9	75.9
Sniper 3D	62.9	115.3
Need for Speed No Limits	40	97.1
Mortal Kombat X	45.8	78.9
CSR Racing 2	34.3	85

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	21 MP	16 MP
Dual Camera resolution		8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X8 LTE modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	100 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 710F is better: 26
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 and Kirin 710F, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 specs and review.

Kirin 710F SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Kirin 710F specs and review.