|
Intel Core i9-10900TE vs Intel Core i7-8086K |
|
Processor comparisons 12-06-2021 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i9-10900TE vs Intel Core i7-8086K and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, VeraCrypt, PassMark, Blender, WPrime, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, Prime95, MATLAB, SuperPi, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, 3DMark, Furmark, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-8086K or Intel Core i9-10900TE.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-10900TE | 55% |
Core i7-8086K | 54% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-10900TE is 1% better than Core i7-8086K. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-10900TE | 54% |
Core i7-8086K | 54% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.8 | 96.2 | Valorant | 108.8 | 109.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.9 | 61.2 | Apex Legends | 102.3 | 102.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.6 | 82.0 | Overwatch | 88.2 | 88.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.1 | 75.4 | DOOM Eternal | 54.4 | 54.7 | Warzone | 84.9 | 85.3 | Assassin's Creed | 91.4 | 91.8 | Valheim | 90.3 | 90.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-10900TE | 111% |
Core i7-8086K | 50% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-10900TE is more energy efficient than the Core i7-8086K since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 95W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-10900TE |
Intel Core i7-8086K | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 199 | 219 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2115 | 1448 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 464 | 467 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4720 | 3292 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1133 | 1321 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10984 | 10209 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-10900TE |
Intel Core i7-8086K | Single-Core | 2525 | 2896 | Multi-Core | 16545 | 14705 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-10900TE |
Intel Core i7-8086K | Single-Core | 1168 | 1427 | Multi-Core | 7620 | 8056 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-10900TE |
Intel Core i7-8086K | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 01, 2018 | Type | Embedded System | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA1151-2 | Core name | Comet Lake | Coffee Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 8 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 5 MHz | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 4 MHz | Cores | 10 | 6 | Threads | 20 | 12 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 9200 millions | 3600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 95 W | Memory type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 20 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-8086K is 55% better than Core i9-10900TE in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-10900TE has 4 more core than Core i7-8086K. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900TE is better: 12
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8086K is better: 19 However, it should be realized that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i9-10900TE and Intel Core i7-8086K before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-10900TE Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300
Intel Core i7-8086K Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
| |
|