 |
Intel Core i7-8086K vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600G |
|
Processor comparisons 24-03-2021
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i7-8086K vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600G tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, 7zip, WPrime, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, AIDA64, 3DMark, Prime95, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, Blender, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 4600G or Intel Core i7-8086K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-8086K | 54% |
Ryzen 5 4600G | 55% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 4600G is 1% better than Core i7-8086K. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-8086K | 54% |
Ryzen 5 4600G | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Control, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.2 | 94.9 | | Valorant | 109.3 | 107.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.2 | 60.4 | | Apex Legends | 102.8 | 101.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.0 | 80.9 | | Overwatch | 88.6 | 87.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.4 | 74.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 53.9 | | Warzone | 85.3 | 84.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 91.8 | 90.6 | | Valheim | 90.8 | 89.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-8086K | 50% |
Ryzen 5 4600G | 62% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 5 4600G is more energy efficient than the Core i7-8086K since it has less power consumption: 95W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8086K |
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 219 | 195 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1448 | 1524 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 467 | 472 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3292 | 3398 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1321 | 1221 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10209 | 9348 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8086K |
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G | | Single-Core | 2896 | 2720 | | Multi-Core | 14705 | 16486 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8086K |
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G | | Single-Core | 1427 | 1216 | | Multi-Core | 8056 | 6756 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-8086K |
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G | | Announcement date | April 01, 2018 | July 21, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1151-2 | AM4 | | Core name | Coffee Lake | Renoir | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 8 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 4.2 MHz | | Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 6 | | Threads | 12 | 12 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 3600 millions | 4600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 95 W | 65 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | 384KB | | L2 cache | | 3MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 8MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | 100-000000147
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-8086K is 7% better than Ryzen 5 4600G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8086K is better: 23
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is better: 13
Although it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-8086K and AMD Ryzen 5 4600G before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-8086K Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
|
|
|
