|
Intel Core i5-13500H vs Apple M1 Max |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-13500H vs Apple M1 Max tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Gears 5, AIDA64, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Handbrake, Furmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, MATLAB, SuperPi, RealBench. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Valheim
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Apple M1 Max or Intel Core i5-13500H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13500H | 57% |
M1 Max | 60% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M1 Max is 5% better than Core i5-13500H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13500H | 56% |
M1 Max | 57% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.0 | 101.3 | Valorant | 112.5 | 115.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.0 | 64.5 | Apex Legends | 105.7 | 108.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.4 | 86.3 | Overwatch | 91.1 | 93.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.6 | 79.4 | DOOM Eternal | 56.2 | 57.6 | Warzone | 87.7 | 89.8 | Assassin's Creed | 94.5 | 96.7 | Valheim | 93.4 | 95.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13500H | 123% |
M1 Max | 332% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Max is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13500H as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 18W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13500H |
Apple M1 Max | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 249 | 313 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2288 | 1811 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 393 | 617 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5045 | 3106 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1302 | 2360 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14449 | 12204 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500H |
Apple M1 Max | Single-Core | 1193 | 5344 | Multi-Core | 24604 | 34572 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500H |
Apple M1 Max | Single-Core | 1670 | 1793 | Multi-Core | 10773 | 13028 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13500H |
Apple M1 Max | Announcement date | January 21, 2023 | October 07, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Laptop;Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | M1 | Core name | Raptor Lake | 8x Firestorm and 2x Icestorm | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 13 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 12 | 10 | Threads | 16 | 10 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 57000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 18 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 409 GByte/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 4MB | L2 cache | 6 MB | 24MB | L3 cache | 18 MB | 48MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| APL1105 | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13500H is 8% better than M1 Max in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13500H has 2 more core than M1 Max. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500H is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Max is better: 23 All the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13500H and Apple M1 Max before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13500H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Apple M1 Max Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
| |
|