|
Intel Core i5-13500H vs Apple M2 Max |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-13500H vs Apple M2 Max tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, programming, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like 7zip, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Blender, Gears 5, WPrime, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, PassMark, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Apple M2 Max or Intel Core i5-13500H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13500H | 57% |
M2 Max | 62% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M2 Max is 8% better than Core i5-13500H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13500H | 56% |
M2 Max | 60% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Control, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.0 | 106.0 | Valorant | 112.5 | 120.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.0 | 67.4 | Apex Legends | 105.7 | 113.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.4 | 90.3 | Overwatch | 91.1 | 97.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.6 | 83.1 | DOOM Eternal | 56.2 | 60.2 | Warzone | 87.7 | 93.9 | Assassin's Creed | 94.5 | 101.2 | Valheim | 93.4 | 99.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13500H | 123% |
M2 Max | 465% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M2 Max is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13500H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13500H |
Apple M2 Max | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 249 | 389 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2288 | 2220 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 393 | 761 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5045 | 3801 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1302 | 2204 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14449 | 17142 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500H |
Apple M2 Max | Single-Core | 1193 | 6536 | Multi-Core | 24604 | 42246 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500H |
Apple M2 Max | Single-Core | 1670 | 2096 | Multi-Core | 10773 | 17617 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13500H |
Apple M2 Max | Announcement date | January 21, 2023 | October 20, 2022 | Type | Laptop | Desktop;Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | M2 | Core name | Raptor Lake | 8x Avalanche and 4x Blizzard | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.49 MHz | Cores | 12 | 12 | Threads | 16 | 12 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 68000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 15 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 412 GByte/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 4MB | L2 cache | 6 MB | 24MB | L3 cache | 18 MB | 48MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13500H is 0% better than M2 Max in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500H is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 Max is better: 24 However, it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13500H and Apple M2 Max before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13500H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Apple M2 Max Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
| |
|