HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) benchmark which processor is better

Kirin 950 vs Helio P65 (MT6768)

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768), comparison of GPUs Mali-G72 MP3 and Mali-T880 MP4.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Kirin 950 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Helio P65 (MT6768) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as Quadrant, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, Vellamo, GFXBench, PassMark, Geekbench, PCMark, Octane V2, and how good the processors are in games Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy Kirin 950 or Helio P65 (MT6768) and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 950

Helio P65 (MT6768)

11%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 950

48%

Helio P65 (MT6768)

64%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 950

Helio P65 (MT6768)

10%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 950	Helio P65 (MT6768)
Total score	100285	166391
CPU	28073	46583
GPU	38102	63232
MEM	16044	26621
UX	18046	29954

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 950	Helio P65 (MT6768)
Single-Core	265	341
Multi-Core	902	1432

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 950	Helio P65 (MT6768)
Frequency	2300 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR3, LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	1800
Memory bandwidth	25.6	13.41
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 950 is 13% better than Helio P65 (MT6768) in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T880 MP4	Mali-G72 MP3
GPU Frequency	900 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	122.31	184
# of Cores	4	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		21.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	22.3	25.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	38.7	55.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	25.5	28.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	19.1	22.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	24.3	31.7
Real Racing 3	48.4	69.9
Sniper 3D	61.9	72.7
Need for Speed No Limits	54.2	78.3
Mortal Kombat X	61.9	64.3
CSR Racing 2	42.6	61.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	20 MP	48 MP
Dual Camera resolution		16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	60
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem		4G LTE WorldMode modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 950 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) is better: 28
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Kirin 950 and Helio P65 (MT6768), as well as read the test results at the links below.

Kirin 950 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Kirin 950 specs and review.

Helio P65 (MT6768) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Helio P65 (MT6768) specs and review.