|
Helio P65 (MT6768) vs Snapdragon 460 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, compare of GPUs Adreno 610 and Mali-G72 MP3. This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio P65 (MT6768) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Snapdragon 460 is octa-core (Kryo 240). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as PassMark, GFXBench, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, AnTuTu, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy Helio P65 (MT6768) or Snapdragon 460 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio P65 (MT6768) | 11% |
Snapdragon 460 | 10% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio P65 (MT6768) | 64% |
Snapdragon 460 | 69% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio P65 (MT6768) | 10% |
Snapdragon 460 | 8% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio P65 (MT6768) |
Snapdragon 460 | Total score | 166391 | 142955 | CPU | 46583 | 40022 | GPU | 63232 | 54316 | MEM | 26621 | 22868 | UX | 29954 | 25725 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio P65 (MT6768) |
Snapdragon 460 | Single-Core | 341 | 292 | Multi-Core | 1432 | 1286 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio P65 (MT6768) |
Snapdragon 460 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 11 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 | Power consumption (TDP) | | 3 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1800 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 13.41 | 13.91 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.3-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio P65 (MT6768) is 9% better than Snapdragon 460 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 610 | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 184 | 312 | # of Cores | 3 | | # of Shader Units | | 192 | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 21.4 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 25.5 | 28.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 55.9 | 40.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 28.7 | 37.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 22.9 | 27.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 31.7 | 40.2 | Real Racing 3 | 69.9 | 70.2 | Sniper 3D | 72.7 | 88.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 78.3 | 72.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 64.3 | 64.2 | CSR Racing 2 | 61.5 | 48.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 48 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 340 | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X11 LTE modem | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 390 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GLONASS, NavIC, QZSS, GPS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, Galileo | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 is better: 14 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Helio P65 (MT6768) and Snapdragon 460, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Helio P65 (MT6768) SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Snapdragon 720G • Vs Snapdragon 730G • Vs Tiger T618 • Vs Helio G80 • Vs Exynos 9810 • Vs Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Helio G85 • Vs Exynos 980 • Vs Tiger T7520 • Vs Tiger T7510 • Vs Kirin 810 • Vs Tiger T710 • Vs Helio G90T • Vs Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Helio G90 • Vs Snapdragon 732G • Vs Snapdragon 855 • Vs Snapdragon 765G • Vs Helio G95 • Vs Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Snapdragon 460 SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|