|
Tiger T310 vs Helio P65 (MT6768) |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Unisoc Tiger T310 vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768), comparison of GPUs Mali-G72 MP3 and Mali-G71 MP2. This performance comparison includes two processors: Tiger T310 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Helio P65 (MT6768) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, GeekBench 6, 5, GFXBench, AnTuTu, PassMark, 3DMark, PCMark, Octane V2, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of chips in Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat etc. After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy Tiger T310 or Helio P65 (MT6768) and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreTiger T310 | 7% |
Helio P65 (MT6768) | 11% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Tiger T310 | 64% |
Helio P65 (MT6768) | 64% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingTiger T310 | 4% |
Helio P65 (MT6768) | 10% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tiger T310 |
Helio P65 (MT6768) | Total score | 102948 | 166391 | CPU | 28818 | 46583 | GPU | 39119 | 63232 | MEM | 16471 | 26621 | UX | 18534 | 29954 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tiger T310 |
Helio P65 (MT6768) | Single-Core | 210 | 341 | Multi-Core | 926 | 1432 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tiger T310 |
Helio P65 (MT6768) | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 3x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1066 | 1800 | Memory bandwidth | 14 | 13.41 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 384 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Tiger T310 has 4 more core than Helio P65 (MT6768). Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G71 MP2 | Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU Frequency | 770 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 52.3 | 184 | # of Cores | 2 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 21.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 23.7 | 25.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 38.5 | 55.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 25.4 | 28.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 19.8 | 22.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 24.1 | 31.7 | Real Racing 3 | 67.4 | 69.9 | Sniper 3D | 61.6 | 72.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 61.6 | 78.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 61.6 | 64.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 42.4 | 61.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE-7 | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T310 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) is better: 27 You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Tiger T310 and Helio P65 (MT6768), and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Tiger T310 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Helio P65 (MT6768) SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Snapdragon 720G • Vs Snapdragon 730G • Vs Tiger T618 • Vs Helio G80 • Vs Exynos 9810 • Vs Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Helio G85 • Vs Exynos 980 • Vs Tiger T7520 • Vs Tiger T7510 • Vs Kirin 810 • Vs Tiger T710 • Vs Helio G90T • Vs Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Helio G90 • Vs Snapdragon 732G • Vs Snapdragon 855 • Vs Snapdragon 765G • Vs Helio G95 • Vs Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|