|
Rockchip RK3562 vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) |
|
Comparisons 17-10-2023 Comprehensive comparison data of Rockchip RK3562 vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768), examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like PassMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, AnTuTu, PCMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy Rockchip RK3562 or Helio P65 (MT6768).
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreRockchip RK3562 | 11% |
Helio P65 (MT6768) | 11% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Rockchip RK3562 | 52% |
Helio P65 (MT6768) | 64% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingRockchip RK3562 | 9% |
Helio P65 (MT6768) | 10% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3562 |
Helio P65 (MT6768) | Total score | 153859 | 166391 | CPU | 43076 | 46583 | GPU | 58462 | 63232 | MEM | 24625 | 26621 | UX | 27698 | 29954 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3562 |
Helio P65 (MT6768) | Single-Core | 403 | 341 | Multi-Core | 1208 | 1432 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3562 |
Helio P65 (MT6768) | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1800 | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 13.41 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Rockchip RK3562 has 4 more core than Helio P65 (MT6768). Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 404 | 184 | # of Cores | 2 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 21.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 29.8 | 25.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 45.4 | 55.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 39.4 | 28.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 28.4 | 22.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 39.4 | 31.7 | Real Racing 3 | 56.6 | 69.9 | Sniper 3D | 71.8 | 72.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 71.8 | 78.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 72.1 | 64.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 59.8 | 61.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3562 is better: 13
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) is better: 23 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Rockchip RK3562 SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Helio P65 (MT6768) SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Snapdragon 720G • Vs Snapdragon 730G • Vs Tiger T618 • Vs Helio G80 • Vs Exynos 9810 • Vs Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Helio G85 • Vs Exynos 980 • Vs Tiger T7520 • Vs Tiger T7510 • Vs Kirin 810 • Vs Tiger T710 • Vs Helio G90T • Vs Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Helio G90 • Vs Snapdragon 732G • Vs Snapdragon 855 • Vs Snapdragon 765G • Vs Helio G95 • Vs Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|