|
Helio P65 (MT6768) vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G71 MP18 and Mali-G72 MP3. This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio P65 (MT6768) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Exynos 7 Octa 7885 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like PassMark, GFXBench, Octane V2, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, Neocore, PCMark, Geekbench, Quadrant, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat etc. After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Helio P65 (MT6768) or Exynos 7 Octa 7885 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio P65 (MT6768) | 11% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | 9% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio P65 (MT6768) | 64% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | 56% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio P65 (MT6768) | 10% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | 7% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio P65 (MT6768) |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | Total score | 166391 | 136471 | CPU | 46583 | 38211 | GPU | 63232 | 51853 | MEM | 26621 | 21835 | UX | 29954 | 24556 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio P65 (MT6768) |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | Single-Core | 341 | 279 | Multi-Core | 1432 | 1228 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio P65 (MT6768) |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2100 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | | 8 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1800 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 13.41 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 64 KB | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Octa 7885 is 4% better than Helio P65 (MT6768) in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G71 MP18 | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 546 MHz | GFloPS | 184 | 334 | # of Cores | 3 | 18 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 21.4 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 25.5 | 26.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 55.9 | 37.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 28.7 | 34.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 22.9 | 25.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 31.7 | 37.7 | Real Racing 3 | 69.9 | 65.3 | Sniper 3D | 72.7 | 48.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 78.3 | 67.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 64.3 | 42.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 61.5 | 44.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 48 MP | 28 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 28 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | LTE Cat.13 3CA | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 is better: 14 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Helio P65 (MT6768) SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Snapdragon 720G • Vs Snapdragon 730G • Vs Tiger T618 • Vs Helio G80 • Vs Exynos 9810 • Vs Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Helio G85 • Vs Exynos 980 • Vs Tiger T7520 • Vs Tiger T7510 • Vs Kirin 810 • Vs Tiger T710 • Vs Helio G90T • Vs Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Helio G90 • Vs Snapdragon 732G • Vs Snapdragon 855 • Vs Snapdragon 765G • Vs Helio G95 • Vs Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|