MediaTek Kompanio 500 vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)

Comparisons   31-08-2022
   Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Kompanio 500 vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768), testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as PCMark, Geekbench, Quadrant, 3DMark, Neocore, Vellamo, GFXBench, PassMark, AnTuTu, and how good the CPUs are in games Call of Duty, Fortnite, GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 500 or Helio P65 (MT6768).

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Kompanio 500

14%

Helio P65 (MT6768)

11%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Kompanio 500

68%

Helio P65 (MT6768)

64%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Kompanio 500

13%

Helio P65 (MT6768)

10%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Kompanio 500	Helio P65 (MT6768)
Total score	195457	166391
CPU	54729	46583
GPU	74271	63232
MEM	31280	26621
UX	35190	29954

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Kompanio 500	Helio P65 (MT6768)
Single-Core	298	341
Multi-Core	1180	1432

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Kompanio 500	Helio P65 (MT6768)
Frequency	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3, LPDDR4x	LPDDR3, LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	8 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	1800
Memory bandwidth	18	13.41
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G72 MP3	Mali-G72 MP3
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	184	184
# of Cores	3	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2400 x 1080 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		21.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	29.4	25.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	54.3	55.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	30.1	28.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	23.4	22.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	39.6	31.7
Real Racing 3	108.5	69.9
Sniper 3D	86.9	72.7
Need for Speed No Limits	86.2	78.3
Mortal Kombat X	86.9	64.3
CSR Racing 2	75.6	61.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	48 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	60
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem		4G LTE WorldMode modem
Upload speed		150 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 500 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) is better: 11
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Kompanio 500 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 500 specs and review.

Helio P65 (MT6768) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Helio P65 (MT6768) specs and review.