|
Helio P65 (MT6768) vs Tiger T618 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) vs Unisoc Tiger T618, comparison of GPUs Mali-G52 MP2 and Mali-G72 MP3. This performance comparison involves two processors: Helio P65 (MT6768) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Tiger T618 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, AnTuTu, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, 3DMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, PCMark, Neocore, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Helio P65 (MT6768) or Tiger T618 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio P65 (MT6768) | 11% |
Tiger T618 | 15% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio P65 (MT6768) | 64% |
Tiger T618 | 66% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio P65 (MT6768) | 10% |
Tiger T618 | 12% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio P65 (MT6768) |
Tiger T618 | Total score | 166391 | 211843 | CPU | 46583 | 59325 | GPU | 63232 | 80491 | MEM | 26621 | 33895 | UX | 29954 | 38140 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio P65 (MT6768) |
Tiger T618 | Single-Core | 341 | 436 | Multi-Core | 1432 | 1747 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio P65 (MT6768) |
Tiger T618 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1800 | 1066 | Memory bandwidth | 13.41 | 13 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 16 KB | L2 cache | | 256 KB | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G52 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 184 | 418.78 | # of Cores | 3 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 21.4 | 25.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 25.5 | 28.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 55.9 | 50.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 28.7 | 31.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 22.9 | 25.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 31.7 | 37.2 | Real Racing 3 | 69.9 | 63.4 | Sniper 3D | 72.7 | 81.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 78.3 | 60.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 64.3 | 73.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 61.5 | 60.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 48 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Vivi Magic | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | LTE-7 | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) is better: 12
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T618 is better: 21 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Helio P65 (MT6768) SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Snapdragon 720G • Vs Snapdragon 730G • Vs Helio G80 • Vs Exynos 9810 • Vs Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Helio G85 • Vs Exynos 980 • Vs Tiger T7520 • Vs Tiger T7510 • Vs Kirin 810 • Vs Tiger T710 • Vs Helio G90T • Vs Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Helio G90 • Vs Snapdragon 732G • Vs Snapdragon 855 • Vs Snapdragon 765G • Vs Helio G95 • Vs Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Tiger T618 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|