MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 benchmark which processor is better

Helio P65 (MT6768) vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890, comparison of GPUs Mali-T880 MP12 and Mali-G72 MP3.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Helio P65 (MT6768) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is octa-core (Exynos Mongoose). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as PCMark, 3DMark, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Octane V2, GFXBench, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock etc.

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Helio P65 (MT6768) or Exynos 8 Octa 8890 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Helio P65 (MT6768)

11%

Exynos 8 Octa 8890

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Helio P65 (MT6768)

64%

Exynos 8 Octa 8890

54%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Helio P65 (MT6768)

10%

Exynos 8 Octa 8890

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Helio P65 (MT6768)	Exynos 8 Octa 8890
Total score	166391	123350
CPU	46583	34536
GPU	63232	46875
MEM	26621	19745
UX	29954	22212

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Helio P65 (MT6768)	Exynos 8 Octa 8890
Single-Core	341	252
Multi-Core	1432	1110

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Helio P65 (MT6768)	Exynos 8 Octa 8890
Frequency	2000 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	12 nm	14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.3 GHz Exynos Mongoose 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)		5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3, LPDDR4x	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	8 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	1800	1866
Memory bandwidth	13.41	26.82
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache		384 KB
L2 cache		2 MB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is 13% better than Helio P65 (MT6768) in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G72 MP3	Mali-T880 MP12
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	184	265
# of Cores	3	12
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	21.4	24.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	25.5	47.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	55.9	50.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	28.7	26.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	22.9	43.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	31.7	61.7
Real Racing 3	69.9	75.6
Sniper 3D	72.7	80.6
Need for Speed No Limits	78.3	80.6
Mortal Kombat X	64.3	58
CSR Racing 2	61.5	70.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	48 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	24 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	60	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	4G LTE WorldMode modem	LTE Cat.12/13 2/3 CA
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 is better: 20
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Helio P65 (MT6768) and Exynos 8 Octa 8890, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Helio P65 (MT6768) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Helio P65 (MT6768) specs and review.

Exynos 8 Octa 8890 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Exynos 8 Octa 8890 specs and review.