 |
Helio P65 (MT6768) vs Helio P90 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021
So, which processor or chip is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) vs MediaTek Helio P90, compare of GPUs PowerVR GM 9446 and Mali-G72 MP3.
This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio P65 (MT6768) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Helio P90 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Octane V2, PassMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, PCMark, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, Vellamo, Neocore, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Helio P65 (MT6768) or Helio P90 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Helio P65 (MT6768) | 11% |
Helio P90 | 11% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Helio P65 (MT6768) | 64% |
Helio P90 | 64% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Helio P65 (MT6768) | 10% |
Helio P90 | 8% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio P65 (MT6768) |
Helio P90 | | Total score | 166391 | 166210 | | CPU | 46583 | 46539 | | GPU | 63232 | 63167 | | MEM | 26621 | 26589 | | UX | 29954 | 29921 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio P65 (MT6768) |
Helio P90 | | Single-Core | 341 | 340 | | Multi-Core | 1432 | 1430 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio P65 (MT6768) |
Helio P90 | | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75
6x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A75
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | | 5 W | | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 1800 | 3733 | | Memory bandwidth | 13.41 | 13.91 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | 1 MB | | L3 cache | | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio P90 is 9% better than Helio P65 (MT6768) in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | PowerVR GM 9446 | | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 970 MHz | | GFloPS | 184 | 247.35 | | # of Cores | 3 | 3 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | 21.4 | 20.7 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 25.5 | 24.4 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 55.9 | 54.4 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | 28.7 | 27.8 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 22.9 | 21.6 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 31.7 | 30.2 | | Real Racing 3 | 69.9 | 108.8 | | Sniper 3D | 72.7 | 103.4 | | Need for Speed No Limits | 78.3 | 97.9 | | Mortal Kombat X | 64.3 | 87 | | CSR Racing 2 | 61.5 | 76.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 48 MP | 48 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 24 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Beidou, Glonass | | NFC support | No | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) is better: 15
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P90 is better: 14
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Helio P65 (MT6768) and Helio P90, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Helio P65 (MT6768) SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio P95
• Vs Snapdragon 675
• Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Snapdragon 662
• Vs Snapdragon 710
• Vs Helio G70
• Vs Exynos 880
• Vs Snapdragon 712
• Vs Snapdragon 730
• Vs Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Tiger T618
• Vs Helio G80
• Vs Exynos 9810
• Vs Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Helio G85
• Vs Exynos 980
• Vs Tiger T7520
• Vs Tiger T7510
• Vs Kirin 810
• Vs Tiger T710
• Vs Helio G90T
• Vs Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs Helio G90
• Vs Snapdragon 732G
• Vs Snapdragon 855
• Vs Snapdragon 765G
• Vs Helio G95
• Vs Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Helio P60
• Vs Kirin 970
• Vs Exynos 9610
• Vs Exynos 9611
• Vs Snapdragon 665
• Vs Snapdragon 670
• Vs Helio P70
• Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Exynos 9609
• Vs Snapdragon 460
• Vs Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs Kirin 710A
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Kirin 710
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Helio G35
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Helio P90 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
|
|
|
