Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 7262 vs AMD EPYC 7742 gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 7262 vs AMD EPYC 7742

Processor comparisons   19-03-2023
   Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7262 vs AMD EPYC 7742 and understand which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Gears 5, VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, PassMark, RealBench, MATLAB, 7zip, Blender, Handbrake, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, Prime95, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Borderlands 3
  • Last Man Standing
  • Valorant
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
  • Overwatch
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Valheim
  • Death Stranding
  • Apex Legends
  • Fallout 76
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Halo Infinite
  • Fortnite
  • Cyberpunk 2077

   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7742 or AMD EPYC 7262.


 
AMD EPYC 7262
AMD EPYC 7742

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 726256% EPYC 774270%
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7742 is 20% better than EPYC 7262. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 726257% EPYC 774278%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Control, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite101.4137.6
Valorant115.2156.4
Cyberpunk 207764.587.6
Apex Legends108.3147.0
Call of Duty Warzone86.4117.3
Overwatch93.3126.7
Red Dead Redemption 279.5107.9
DOOM Eternal57.678.2
Warzone89.9122.0
Assassin's Creed96.8131.3
Valheim95.6129.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 726222% EPYC 774216%
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7262 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7742 since it has less power consumption: 155W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

Let's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 7262 AMD EPYC 7742
Cinbench 15 Single-core199202
Cinbench 15 Multi-core19228334
Cinbench 20 Single-core398398
Cinbench 20 Multi-core421220644
Cinbench 23 Single-core1148933
Cinbench 23 Multi-core1172145938

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7262 AMD EPYC 7742
Single-Core19152352
Multi-Core2119067386

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7262 AMD EPYC 7742
Single-Core10371091
Multi-Core1312448624

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!

AMD EPYC 7262 AMD EPYC 7742
Announcement dateOctober 01, 2019April 01, 2019
TypeServerServer
SocketSP3SP3
Core nameRomeRome
ArchitectureZen 2Zen 2
Generation22
Turbo Frequency3.4 MHz3.4 MHz
Frequency3.2 MHz2.25 MHz
Cores864
Threads16128
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm7 nm
Transistors count42000 millions86000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)155 W225 W
Memory typeDDR4DDR4
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency3200
Memory bandwidth
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache128MB256MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoNo
Part number100-000000041
100-100000041WOF
100-000000053
100-100000053WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7262 is 29% better than EPYC 7742 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7742 has 56 more core than EPYC 7262. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7262 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7742 is better: 23
   However, it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7262 and AMD EPYC 7742 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7262 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 7742 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


AMD EPYC 7262 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 7742 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands