Processor comparisons 08-01-2022
Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i7-12800H vs AMD EPYC 7742 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, machine learning, video editing, rendering, streaming. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Gears 5, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, SuperPi, Blender, Handbrake, AIDA64, PassMark, WPrime, Blender, Geekbench 5.2, Prime95, VeraCrypt, Furmark, MATLAB.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7742 or Intel Core i7-12800H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-12800H | 69% |
EPYC 7742 | 87% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7742 is 20% better than Core i7-12800H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-12800H | 61% |
EPYC 7742 | 92% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 107.6 | 163.1 | | Valorant | 122.3 | 185.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 68.5 | 103.8 | | Apex Legends | 115.0 | 174.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 91.7 | 139.0 | | Overwatch | 99.1 | 150.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 84.4 | 127.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 61.2 | 92.7 | | Warzone | 95.4 | 144.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 102.7 | 155.7 | | Valheim | 101.5 | 153.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-12800H | 132% |
EPYC 7742 | 16% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-12800H is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7742 as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-12800H |
AMD EPYC 7742 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 463 | 202 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3376 | 8334 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1106 | 398 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7663 | 20644 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2589 | 933 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 25265 | 45938 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-12800H |
AMD EPYC 7742 | | Single-Core | 6061 | 2352 | | Multi-Core | 35372 | 67386 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-12800H |
AMD EPYC 7742 | | Single-Core | 1793 | 1091 | | Multi-Core | 12699 | 48624 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-12800H |
AMD EPYC 7742 | | Announcement date | January 07, 2022 | April 01, 2019 | | Type | Laptop | Server | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | SP3 | | Core name | Alder Lake | Rome | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 12 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 3.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 2.25 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 64 | | Threads | 20 | 128 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 10200 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 225 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | 100-000000053
100-100000053WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-12800H is 39% better than EPYC 7742 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7742 has 50 more core than Core i7-12800H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-12800H is better: 13
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7742 is better: 20
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i7-12800H and AMD EPYC 7742 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Core i9-12900KF Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7742
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Core i9-12900KF Vs EPYC 7742
• EPYC 7543 Vs EPYC 7742
|
