|
AMD EPYC 7742 vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|
Processor comparisons 23-03-2021 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7742 vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, programming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Furmark, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Prime95, 3DMark, PCMark 10, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, Blender, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT or AMD EPYC 7742.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7742 | 70% |
Ryzen 9 3900XT | 60% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7742 is 14% better than Ryzen 9 3900XT. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7742 | 78% |
Ryzen 9 3900XT | 57% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Control, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 137.6 | 101.5 | Valorant | 156.4 | 115.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 87.6 | 64.6 | Apex Legends | 147.0 | 108.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 117.3 | 86.5 | Overwatch | 126.7 | 93.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 107.9 | 79.6 | DOOM Eternal | 78.2 | 57.7 | Warzone | 122.0 | 90.0 | Assassin's Creed | 131.3 | 96.9 | Valheim | 129.8 | 95.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7742 | 16% |
Ryzen 9 3900XT | 44% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 9 3900XT is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7742 as it consumes less power: 225W vs. 105W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7742 |
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 202 | 219 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8334 | 3192 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 398 | 539 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 20644 | 7244 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 933 | 1354 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 45938 | 18511 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7742 |
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | Single-Core | 2352 | 2772 | Multi-Core | 67386 | 33164 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7742 |
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | Single-Core | 1091 | 1403 | Multi-Core | 48624 | 13238 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7742 |
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | Announcement date | April 01, 2019 | July 19, 2020 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | SP3 | AM4 | Core name | Rome | Matisse | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | Generation | 2 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 4.7 MHz | Frequency | 2.25 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Cores | 64 | 12 | Threads | 128 | 24 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 7800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 105 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | 6MB | L3 cache | 256MB | 64MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000053 100-100000053WOF
| 100-100000277WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 9 3900XT is 40% better than EPYC 7742 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7742 has 52 more core than Ryzen 9 3900XT. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7742 is better: 19
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT is better: 14 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7742 and AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7742 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|