|
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T vs AMD EPYC 7742 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Xeon Silver 4410T vs AMD EPYC 7742 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as AIDA64, Blender, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Furmark, SuperPi, RealBench. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7742 or Intel Xeon Silver 4410T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Silver 4410T | 57% |
EPYC 7742 | 70% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7742 is 18% better than Xeon Silver 4410T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Silver 4410T | 64% |
EPYC 7742 | 78% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 113.2 | 137.6 | Valorant | 128.6 | 156.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 87.6 | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 147.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 117.3 | Overwatch | 104.2 | 126.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 107.9 | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 78.2 | Warzone | 100.3 | 122.0 | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 131.3 | Valheim | 106.7 | 129.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Silver 4410T | 29% |
EPYC 7742 | 16% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Silver 4410T is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7742 as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7742 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 509 | 202 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2388 | 8334 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1223 | 398 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5323 | 20644 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3011 | 933 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13359 | 45938 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7742 | Single-Core | 388 | 2352 | Multi-Core | 26159 | 67386 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7742 | Single-Core | 1323 | 1091 | Multi-Core | 24668 | 48624 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7742 | Announcement date | March 14, 2023 | April 01, 2019 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | Generation | 4 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 2.25 MHz | Cores | 10 | 64 | Threads | 20 | 128 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 225 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 26.25 MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000053 100-100000053WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Silver 4410T is 16% better than EPYC 7742 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7742 has 54 more core than Xeon Silver 4410T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4410T is better: 13
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7742 is better: 20 All the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon Silver 4410T and AMD EPYC 7742 before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7742 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|