 |
AMD EPYC 9354P vs AMD EPYC 7272 |
|
Processor comparisons 13-03-2023 Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 9354P vs AMD EPYC 7272 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, rendering, video editing, machine learning, streaming. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, Prime95, WPrime, PCMark 10, PassMark, 7zip, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Blender, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Blender, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7272 or AMD EPYC 9354P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9354P | 70% |
EPYC 7272 | 62% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9354P is 11% better than EPYC 7272. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9354P | 75% |
EPYC 7272 | 60% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 132.6 | 106.7 | Valorant | 150.6 | 121.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 84.4 | 67.9 | Apex Legends | 141.6 | 114.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 113.0 | 91.0 | Overwatch | 122.0 | 98.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 103.9 | 83.7 | DOOM Eternal | 75.3 | 60.6 | Warzone | 117.5 | 94.6 | Assassin's Creed | 126.5 | 101.9 | Valheim | 125.0 | 100.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9354P | 26% |
EPYC 7272 | 43% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7272 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9354P since it has less power consumption: 280W vs. 120W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9354P |
AMD EPYC 7272 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 170 | 395 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8374 | 3819 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 350 | 595 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 17783 | 8372 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 911 | 2377 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 46297 | 21304 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9354P |
AMD EPYC 7272 | Single-Core | 2087 | 3257 | Multi-Core | 67926 | 42125 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9354P |
AMD EPYC 7272 | Single-Core | 2223 | 1569 | Multi-Core | 43685 | 18372 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9354P |
AMD EPYC 7272 | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | Core name | Genoa | Milan | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Frequency | 3.25 MHz | 2.9 MHz | Cores | 32 | 12 | Threads | 64 | 24 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 42000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 120 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 64MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000805 100-100000805WOF | 100-000000079 100-100000079WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9354P is 10% better than EPYC 7272 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9354P has 20 more core than EPYC 7272. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9354P is better: 29
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7272 is better: 6 Although it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 9354P and AMD EPYC 7272 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9354P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7272 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|