|
Intel Atom Z3590 vs MediaTek MT6737 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks Intel Atom Z3590 vs MediaTek MT6737, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and PowerVR G6430. This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom Z3590 is quad-core (Moorefield) and MT6737 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Vellamo, Quadrant, PassMark, 3DMark, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, PCMark, even the gaming performance of chips in Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3 etc. After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Atom Z3590 or MT6737 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Atom Z3590 |
MT6737 | Total score | 49101 | 29344 | CPU | 13755 | 8218 | GPU | 18661 | 11149 | MEM | 7866 | 4686 | UX | 8833 | 5285 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Atom Z3590 |
MT6737 | Single-Core | 130 | 77 | Multi-Core | 600 | 358 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Atom Z3590 |
MT6737 | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 1300 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.5 GHz Moorefield | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR2, LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 3 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 640 | Memory bandwidth | 13 | 4.9 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom Z3590 is 48% better than MT6737 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR G6430 | Mali-T720 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 640 MHz | 550 MHz | GFloPS | 163.78 | 18.7 | # of Cores | 4 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 16.5 | 9.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 41.7 | 23.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 27.5 | 15.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 24.6 | 14.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 34.6 | 19.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 51.5 | 30.7 | Real Racing 3 | 48.1 | 19.9 | Sniper 3D | 60.5 | 30.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 49.5 | 19.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 39.9 | 25.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 35.8 | 19.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | HD | Codec support | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Intel XMM 7160 | | Download speed | 72 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 6 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z3590 is better: 34
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737 is better: 2 You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Atom Z3590 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
MT6737 SoC Comparisons • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
| |
|