Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs Intel Atom Z3590 benchmark which processor is better

HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs Intel Atom Z3590

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Full compare data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs Intel Atom Z3590, speed testing of GPUs PowerVR G6430 and Mali-450 MP4.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 620 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Atom Z3590 is quad-core (Moorefield). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.

   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as PCMark, Neocore, Octane V2, Quadrant, Vellamo, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, and how good the SoCs are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy Kirin 620 or Atom Z3590 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2.


 
HiSilicon Kirin 620
Intel Atom Z3590

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Kirin 6202% Atom Z35903%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Kirin 62024% Atom Z359035%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Kirin 6201% Atom Z35901%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Kirin 620 Atom Z3590
Total score3388549101
CPU948013755
GPU1286718661
MEM54307866
UX60898833

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Kirin 620 Atom Z3590
Single-Core90130
Multi-Core414600

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Kirin 620 Atom Z3590
Frequency1200 MHz2500 MHz
Cores84
Bit6464
Lithography28 nm22 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration8x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A534x2.5 GHz Moorefield
Power consumption (TDP)5 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR3xLPDDR3
Max. Memory4 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency8001600
Memory bandwidth2813
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache64 KB32 KB
L2 cache4 MB1 MB
L3 cache4 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom Z3590 is 52% better than Kirin 620 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Kirin 620 has -4 more core than Atom Z3590. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-450 MP4PowerVR G6430
GPU Frequency500 MHz640 MHz
GFloPS29.81163.78
# of Cores44
# of Shader Units
Display1920 x 1080 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile11.916.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)28.441.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra19.127.5
Call of Duty: Mobile17.424.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)23.534.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition35.451.5
Real Racing 338.248.1
Sniper 3D24.860.5
Need for Speed No Limits22.949.5
Mortal Kombat X24.839.9
CSR Racing 224.835.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264


Networks and Navigation
ModemIntel XMM 7160
Download speed150 MBit/s.72 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.6 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 620 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z3590 is better: 24
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Kirin 620 and Atom Z3590, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Kirin 620 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Atom Z3590 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark


Kirin 620 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S


Atom Z3590 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands