|
Unisoc SC9850K vs Intel Atom Z3590 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks Unisoc SC9850K vs Intel Atom Z3590, speed testing of GPUs PowerVR G6430 and Mali-T820. This performance comparison includes two processors: SC9850K is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Atom Z3590 is quad-core (Moorefield). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications like 3DMark, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of processors in PUBG, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3 etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy SC9850K or Atom Z3590 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | SC9850K |
Atom Z3590 | Total score | 41717 | 49101 | CPU | 11684 | 13755 | GPU | 15861 | 18661 | MEM | 6672 | 7866 | UX | 7507 | 8833 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | SC9850K |
Atom Z3590 | Single-Core | 110 | 130 | Multi-Core | 509 | 600 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | SC9850K |
Atom Z3590 | Frequency | 1300 MHz | 2500 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 32 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 4x2.5 GHz Moorefield | Power consumption (TDP) | 3 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 266 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 14 | 13 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom Z3590 is 48% better than SC9850K in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T820 | PowerVR G6430 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 640 MHz | GFloPS | 10.2 | 163.78 | # of Cores | 1 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1440 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 12.7 | 16.5 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 33.6 | 41.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 22.6 | 27.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 19.5 | 24.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 27.7 | 34.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 42.7 | 51.5 | Real Racing 3 | 39.6 | 48.1 | Sniper 3D | 29.4 | 60.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 40.7 | 49.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 36.2 | 39.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 27.1 | 35.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Intel XMM 7160 | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 72 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 6 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc SC9850K is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z3590 is better: 28 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets SC9850K and Atom Z3590, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
SC9850K SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
Atom Z3590 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
| |
|