Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 vs Intel Atom Z3590

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 vs Intel Atom Z3590, speed examination of GPUs PowerVR G6430 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 7 Quad 7578 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Atom Z3590 is quad-core (Moorefield). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as PCMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, Octane V2, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, AnTuTu, Quadrant, and how good the processors are in games PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Exynos 7 Quad 7578 or Atom Z3590 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 7 Quad 7578

Atom Z3590

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 7 Quad 7578

55%

Atom Z3590

35%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 7 Quad 7578

Atom Z3590

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 7 Quad 7578	Atom Z3590
Total score	35491	49101
CPU	9946	13755
GPU	13477	18661
MEM	5678	7866
UX	6394	8833

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 7 Quad 7578	Atom Z3590
Single-Core	94	130
Multi-Core	433	600

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 7 Quad 7578	Atom Z3590
Frequency	1500 MHz	2500 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.5 GHz Moorefield
Power consumption (TDP)	4 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	2 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	1066	1600
Memory bandwidth	7	13
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	384 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom Z3590 is 40% better than Exynos 7 Quad 7578 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	PowerVR G6430
GPU Frequency	668 MHz	640 MHz
GFloPS	22.71	163.78
# of Cores	2	4
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	10.7	16.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	27.2	41.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	17.7	27.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	14.1	24.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	23.3	34.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	35.2	51.5
Real Racing 3	35.4	48.1
Sniper 3D	33.6	60.5
Need for Speed No Limits	24.8	49.5
Mortal Kombat X	25.7	39.9
CSR Racing 2	24.8	35.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264, MPEG-4, VP8	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem	LTE Cat.4 2CA	Intel XMM 7160
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	72 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	6 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z3590 is better: 27
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Exynos 7 Quad 7578 and Atom Z3590, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Exynos 7 Quad 7578 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Exynos 7 Quad 7578 specs and review.

Atom Z3590 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Atom Z3590 specs and review.