MediaTek MT6595M vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6595M vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B, compare of GPUs Mali-G71 MP2 and PowerVR SGX544.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6595M is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A17) and Exynos 7 Octa 7884B is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, PCMark, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, Neocore, Quadrant, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of processors in Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy MT6595M or Exynos 7 Octa 7884B and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6595M

Exynos 7 Octa 7884B

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6595M

24%

Exynos 7 Octa 7884B

61%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6595M

Exynos 7 Octa 7884B

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6595M	Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
Total score	60152	69828
CPU	16841	19550
GPU	22865	26528
MEM	9626	11165
UX	10822	12569

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6595M	Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
Single-Core	155	180
Multi-Core	700	813

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6595M	Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
Frequency	2000 MHz	1600 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A17 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	2x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 6x1.35 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	2 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	1866
Memory bandwidth	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6595M is 19% better than Exynos 7 Octa 7884B in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR SGX544	Mali-G71 MP2
GPU Frequency	357 MHz	770 MHz
GFloPS	11.48	52.3
# of Cores	1	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	10.9	15.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	19.7	25.3
Call of Duty: Mobile	11.2	17.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	7.2	12.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	11.5	16.8
Real Racing 3	39.4	31.6
Sniper 3D	25.6	48.1
Need for Speed No Limits	23.6	35.4
Mortal Kombat X	22.7	29.1
CSR Racing 2	25.6	32.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	28 MP
Dual Camera resolution		28 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.13 3CA
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6595M is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B is better: 30
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips MT6595M and Exynos 7 Octa 7884B, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6595M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• MT6595M specs and review.

Exynos 7 Octa 7884B SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• Exynos 7 Octa 7884B specs and review.