MediaTek MT6595M vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6595M vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420, speed examination of GPUs PowerVR SGX544 and Mali-T760 MP8.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6595M is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A17) and Exynos 7 Octa 7420 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A57). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Neocore, AnTuTu, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, GFXBench, Geekbench, Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy MT6595M or Exynos 7 Octa 7420 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6595M

Exynos 7 Octa 7420

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6595M

24%

Exynos 7 Octa 7420

52%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6595M

Exynos 7 Octa 7420

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6595M	Exynos 7 Octa 7420
Total score	60152	79294
CPU	16841	22205
GPU	22865	30121
MEM	9626	12689
UX	10822	14262

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6595M	Exynos 7 Octa 7420
Single-Core	155	205
Multi-Core	700	923

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6595M	Exynos 7 Octa 7420
Frequency	2000 MHz	2100 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A17 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A57 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	2 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	1866
Memory bandwidth	14	24.8
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Octa 7420 is 4% better than MT6595M in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR SGX544	Mali-T760 MP8
GPU Frequency	357 MHz	772 MHz
GFloPS	11.48	210
# of Cores	1	8
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	3840 x 2400 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	10.9	14.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	19.7	27.3
Call of Duty: Mobile	11.2	15.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	7.2	11.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	11.5	14.3
Real Racing 3	39.4	47.8
Sniper 3D	25.6	35.5
Need for Speed No Limits	23.6	32.8
Mortal Kombat X	22.7	35.5
CSR Racing 2	25.6	30

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	42 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	11 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6595M is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 is better: 31
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets MT6595M and Exynos 7 Octa 7420, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6595M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• MT6595M specs and review.

Exynos 7 Octa 7420 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Exynos 7 Octa 7420 specs and review.