|
MediaTek MT6595M vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6595M vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, comparison of GPUs Adreno 508 and PowerVR SGX544. This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6595M is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A17) and Snapdragon 630 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Vellamo, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, PCMark, Geekbench, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy MT6595M or Snapdragon 630 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT6595M | 4% |
Snapdragon 630 | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT6595M | 24% |
Snapdragon 630 | 56% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT6595M | 3% |
Snapdragon 630 | 3% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6595M |
Snapdragon 630 | Total score | 60152 | 66704 | CPU | 16841 | 18684 | GPU | 22865 | 25348 | MEM | 9626 | 10665 | UX | 10822 | 12001 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6595M |
Snapdragon 630 | Single-Core | 155 | 172 | Multi-Core | 700 | 776 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6595M |
Snapdragon 630 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 32 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A17 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 14 | 10.66 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 630 is 9% better than MT6595M in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR SGX544 | Adreno 508 | GPU Frequency | 357 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 11.48 | 170 | # of Cores | 1 | | # of Shader Units | | 128 | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 10.9 | 13.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 19.7 | 23.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 11.2 | 15.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 7.2 | 10.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 11.5 | 14.2 | Real Racing 3 | 39.4 | 40.6 | Sniper 3D | 25.6 | 30.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 23.6 | 32.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 22.7 | 33.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 25.6 | 32.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9, VP8 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6595M is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 is better: 32 You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT6595M SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
Snapdragon 630 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MT6750T • Vs MT6750 • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
| |
|