MediaTek MT6752 vs MediaTek MT6595M

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6752 vs MediaTek MT6595M, comparison of GPUs PowerVR SGX544 and Mali-T760 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6752 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6595M is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A17). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications like Octane V2, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, Neocore, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of processors in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy MT6752 or MT6595M and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6752

MT6595M

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6752

23%

MT6595M

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6752

MT6595M

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6752	MT6595M
Total score	43446	60152
CPU	12157	16841
GPU	16512	22865
MEM	6954	9626
UX	7821	10822

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6752	MT6595M
Single-Core	115	155
Multi-Core	531	700

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6752	MT6595M
Frequency	1700 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A17 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	667
Memory bandwidth	6	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6595M is 15% better than MT6752 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T760 MP2	PowerVR SGX544
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	357 MHz
GFloPS	47.6	11.48
# of Cores	2	1
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	13.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	35.4	10.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	23.8	19.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	20.6	11.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	29.1	7.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	44.5	11.5
Real Racing 3	47.6	39.4
Sniper 3D	45.2	25.6
Need for Speed No Limits	38.1	23.6
Mortal Kombat X	34.5	22.7
CSR Racing 2	28.6	25.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6752 is better: 18
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6595M is better: 10
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs MT6752 and MT6595M, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6752 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• MT6752 specs and review.

MT6595M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• MT6595M specs and review.