MediaTek MT6595M vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6595M vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, speed examination of GPUs Adreno 418 and PowerVR SGX544.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6595M is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A17) and Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 is gexa-core (ARM Cortex-A57). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like GeekBench 6, 5, PassMark, Octane V2, 3DMark, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Neocore, Quadrant, PCMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy MT6595M or Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6595M

Snapdragon 808 MSM8992

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6595M

24%

Snapdragon 808 MSM8992

38%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6595M

Snapdragon 808 MSM8992

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6595M	Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
Total score	60152	63981
CPU	16841	17918
GPU	22865	24320
MEM	9626	10236
UX	10822	11509

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6595M	Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
Single-Core	155	165
Multi-Core	700	745

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6595M	Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
Frequency	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	6
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	20 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A17 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A57 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	2 Gb	6 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	933
Memory bandwidth	14	7
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that MT6595M has -2 more core than Snapdragon 808 MSM8992. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR SGX544	Adreno 418
GPU Frequency	357 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	11.48	172.8
# of Cores	1
# of Shader Units		128
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	10.9	12.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	19.7	22.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	11.2	14.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	7.2	10.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	11.5	13.7
Real Racing 3	39.4	28.4
Sniper 3D	25.6	36.3
Need for Speed No Limits	23.6	31.8
Mortal Kombat X	22.7	36.3
CSR Racing 2	25.6	31.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	21 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem		Qualcomm Snapdragon X10 LTE modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	450 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6595M is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 is better: 28
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs MT6595M and Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6595M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• MT6595M specs and review.

Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 specs and review.