MediaTek Helio A22 vs MediaTek MT6595M

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio A22 vs MediaTek MT6595M, speed testing of GPUs PowerVR SGX544 and PowerVR GE8320.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio A22 is quad-core (Cortex-A53) and MT6595M is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A17). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like AnTuTu, Vellamo, Geekbench, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of chips in Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Helio A22 or MT6595M and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Helio A22

MT6595M

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Helio A22

62%

MT6595M

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Helio A22

MT6595M

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Helio A22	MT6595M
Total score	53208	60152
CPU	14902	16841
GPU	20218	22865
MEM	8521	9626
UX	9582	10822

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Helio A22	MT6595M
Single-Core	137	155
Multi-Core	619	700

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Helio A22	MT6595M
Frequency	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	4	8
Bit	64	32
Lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53	4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A17 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	4 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3, LPDDR4x	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	6 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz	667
Memory bandwidth	13.9	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Helio A22 has 4 more core than MT6595M. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8320	PowerVR SGX544
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	357 MHz
GFloPS	126.8	11.48
# of Cores	2	1
# of Shader Units
Display	1600 x 720 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	17.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	45.5	10.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	31.4	19.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	27.2	11.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	37.7	7.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	56.8	11.5
Real Racing 3	47.1	39.4
Sniper 3D	69.1	25.6
Need for Speed No Limits	37.7	23.6
Mortal Kombat X	50.2	22.7
CSR Racing 2	40.8	25.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	21 MP	16 MP
Dual Camera resolution	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio A22 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6595M is better: 14
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Helio A22 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Helio A22 specs and review.

MT6595M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• MT6595M specs and review.