Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Spreadtrum SC7731C vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 benchmark which processor is better

Spreadtrum SC7731C vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Spreadtrum SC7731C vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420, comparison of GPUs Mali-T628 MP6 and Mali-400 MP2.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: Spreadtrum SC7731C is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Exynos 5 Octa 5420 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A15). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.

   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as 3DMark, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu 8, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Neocore, Octane V2, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, even the gaming performance of processors in Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Spreadtrum SC7731C or Exynos 5 Octa 5420 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.


 
Spreadtrum SC7731C
Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Spreadtrum SC7731C1% Exynos 5 Octa 54202%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Spreadtrum SC7731C24% Exynos 5 Octa 542021%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Spreadtrum SC7731C1% Exynos 5 Octa 54201%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Spreadtrum SC7731C Exynos 5 Octa 5420
Total score1748633608
CPU48939416
GPU663812777
MEM27965370
UX31526058

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Spreadtrum SC7731C Exynos 5 Octa 5420
Single-Core4689
Multi-Core213410

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Spreadtrum SC7731C Exynos 5 Octa 5420
Frequency1200 MHz1900 MHz
Cores48
Bit3264
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A74x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A15
4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)7 W4 W
Memory typeLPDDR2LPDDR3
Max. Memory1 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency2661650
Memory bandwidth47
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache8 MB4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 5 Octa 5420 is 36% better than Spreadtrum SC7731C in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Spreadtrum SC7731C has 4 more core than Exynos 5 Octa 5420. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-400 MP2Mali-T628 MP6
GPU Frequency400 MHz680 MHz
GFloPS8.4176
# of Cores26
# of Shader Units
Display1280 x 800 pixels2560 x 1600 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile3.29.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)12.126.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra7.317.6
Call of Duty: Mobile6.615.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)10.421.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition16.533.3
Real Racing 39.130.8
Sniper 3D13.938.7
Need for Speed No Limits13.121.1
Mortal Kombat X8.422.9
CSR Racing 28.822.9
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
    Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.


Cameras
Camera resolution8 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3060
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8


Networks and Navigation
ModemTD-SCDMA/GGE
Upload speed11 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC7731C is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 is better: 37
   You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Spreadtrum SC7731C and Exynos 5 Octa 5420, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Spreadtrum SC7731C SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
Exynos 5 Octa 5420 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark


Spreadtrum SC7731C SoC Comparisons
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT6575


Exynos 5 Octa 5420 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands