|
Rockchip RK3562 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 |
|
Comparisons 17-10-2023 Comprehensive testing data of Rockchip RK3562 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, PassMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of chips in Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, Minecraft, PUBG etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Rockchip RK3562 or Snapdragon 662.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreRockchip RK3562 | 11% |
Snapdragon 662 | 13% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Rockchip RK3562 | 52% |
Snapdragon 662 | 68% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingRockchip RK3562 | 9% |
Snapdragon 662 | 10% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3562 |
Snapdragon 662 | Total score | 153859 | 182816 | CPU | 43076 | 51179 | GPU | 58462 | 69479 | MEM | 24625 | 29244 | UX | 27698 | 32900 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3562 |
Snapdragon 662 | Single-Core | 403 | 374 | Multi-Core | 1208 | 1573 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3562 |
Snapdragon 662 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 11 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1866/933 | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 13.91 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Rockchip RK3562 has 4 more core than Snapdragon 662. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Adreno 610 | GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 404 | 312 | # of Cores | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | 192 | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 24.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 29.8 | 29.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 45.4 | 61.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 39.4 | 32.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 28.4 | 25.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 39.4 | 35.2 | Real Racing 3 | 56.6 | 92.3 | Sniper 3D | 71.8 | 98.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 71.8 | 86.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 72.1 | 80 | CSR Racing 2 | 59.8 | 86.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 340T | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 390 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3562 is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is better: 22 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Rockchip RK3562 SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Snapdragon 662 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|