Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Rockchip RK3562 vs Unisoc Tiger T612 benchmark which processor is better

Rockchip RK3562 vs Unisoc Tiger T612

Comparisons   17-10-2023
   Comprehensive comparison data of Rockchip RK3562 vs Unisoc Tiger T612, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PCMark, 3DMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Neocore, GFXBench, and how good the processors are in games Asphalt 9, Madout2, Fortnite, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc.
   After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Rockchip RK3562 or Unisoc Tiger T612.


 
Rockchip RK3562
Unisoc Tiger T612

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Rockchip RK356211% Unisoc Tiger T61216%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Rockchip RK356252% Unisoc Tiger T61271%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Rockchip RK35629% Unisoc Tiger T61215%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Rockchip RK3562 Unisoc Tiger T612
Total score153859224582
CPU4307662875
GPU5846285351
MEM2462535934
UX2769840420

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Rockchip RK3562 Unisoc Tiger T612
Single-Core403367
Multi-Core12081368

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Rockchip RK3562 Unisoc Tiger T612
Frequency2000 MHz1800 MHz
Cores48
Bit6464
Lithography22 nm12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A552x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75
6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)7 W9 W
Memory typeLPDDR3, LPDDR4xLPDDR4
Max. Memory8 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency6671066
Memory bandwidth1629
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache8 MB1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8.1-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Rockchip RK3562 is 9% better than Unisoc Tiger T612 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Rockchip RK3562 has 4 more core than Unisoc Tiger T612. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G52 2EEMC2Mali-G57 MP4
GPU Frequency820 MHz600 MHz
GFloPS404498
# of Cores24
# of Shader Units
Display1920 x 1080 pixels2160 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile21.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)29.843.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra45.448.8
Call of Duty: Mobile39.438.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)28.437.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition39.452.6
Real Racing 356.685.1
Sniper 3D71.8106.9
Need for Speed No Limits71.887.8
Mortal Kombat X72.170.1
CSR Racing 259.858.3
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution16 MP16 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS6030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE-7
Download speed150 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoYes
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3562 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T612 is better: 27
   You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Rockchip RK3562 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Unisoc Tiger T612 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Rockchip RK3562 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Samsung Exynos 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs MediaTek Helio G25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
• Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603


Unisoc Tiger T612 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T700
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands