|
Rockchip RK3562 vs MediaTek Helio G99 |
|
Comparisons 17-10-2023 Comprehensive comparison data of Rockchip RK3562 vs MediaTek Helio G99, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Geekbench, 3DMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, PassMark, Quadrant, and how good the chips are in games Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Rockchip RK3562 or MediaTek Helio G99.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreRockchip RK3562 | 11% |
MediaTek Helio G99 | 26% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Rockchip RK3562 | 52% |
MediaTek Helio G99 | 70% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingRockchip RK3562 | 9% |
MediaTek Helio G99 | 24% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3562 |
MediaTek Helio G99 | Total score | 153859 | 361581 | CPU | 43076 | 101249 | GPU | 58462 | 137402 | MEM | 24625 | 57851 | UX | 27698 | 65075 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3562 |
MediaTek Helio G99 | Single-Core | 403 | 652 | Multi-Core | 1208 | 1982 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3562 |
MediaTek Helio G99 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 10 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 4266 | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 12 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Helio G99 is 9% better than Rockchip RK3562 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Rockchip RK3562 has 4 more core than MediaTek Helio G99. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 | GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 950 MHz | GFloPS | 404 | 486 | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 28.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 29.8 | 55.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 45.4 | 46.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 39.4 | 38.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 28.4 | 47.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 39.4 | 72.1 | Real Racing 3 | 56.6 | 69.7 | Sniper 3D | 71.8 | 87.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 71.8 | 64.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 72.1 | 53.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 59.8 | 55.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 108 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NAVIC, BeiDou B1C + B2a, QZSS L1+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3562 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G99 is better: 30 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Rockchip RK3562 SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
MediaTek Helio G99 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
| |
|