|
Rockchip RK3562 vs Unisoc SC9863A1 |
|
Comparisons 17-10-2023 Full testing data of Rockchip RK3562 vs Unisoc SC9863A1, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PCMark, PassMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Neocore, Geekbench, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9 etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy Rockchip RK3562 or SC9863A1.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreRockchip RK3562 | 11% |
SC9863A1 | 5% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Rockchip RK3562 | 52% |
SC9863A1 | 39% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingRockchip RK3562 | 9% |
SC9863A1 | 3% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3562 |
SC9863A1 | Total score | 153859 | 78669 | CPU | 43076 | 22021 | GPU | 58462 | 29889 | MEM | 24625 | 12590 | UX | 27698 | 14160 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3562 |
SC9863A1 | Single-Core | 403 | 203 | Multi-Core | 1208 | 916 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3562 |
SC9863A1 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1700 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 933 | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Rockchip RK3562 is 15% better than SC9863A1 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Rockchip RK3562 has 4 more core than SC9863A1. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | IMG8322 | GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 510 MHz | GFloPS | 404 | 146.2 | # of Cores | 2 | 128 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 29.8 | 14.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 45.4 | 27.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 39.4 | 14.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 28.4 | 11.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 39.4 | 14.6 | Real Racing 3 | 56.6 | 47.6 | Sniper 3D | 71.8 | 35.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 71.8 | 32.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 72.1 | 35.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 59.8 | 29.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | LTE-4 | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3562 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which Unisoc SC9863A1 is better: 9 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Rockchip RK3562 SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
SC9863A1 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|