|
Rockchip RK3562 vs Samsung Exynos 850 |
|
Comparisons 17-10-2023 Detailed comparison data of Rockchip RK3562 vs Samsung Exynos 850, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, 3DMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, Vellamo, Neocore, PassMark, PCMark, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of processors in GTA, Fortnite, PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Rockchip RK3562 or Exynos 850.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreRockchip RK3562 | 11% |
Exynos 850 | 8% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Rockchip RK3562 | 52% |
Exynos 850 | 74% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingRockchip RK3562 | 9% |
Exynos 850 | 5% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3562 |
Exynos 850 | Total score | 153859 | 119144 | CPU | 43076 | 33358 | GPU | 58462 | 45266 | MEM | 24625 | 19058 | UX | 27698 | 21445 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3562 |
Exynos 850 | Single-Core | 403 | 243 | Multi-Core | 1208 | 1072 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3562 |
Exynos 850 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 8 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 16 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Rockchip RK3562 has 4 more core than Exynos 850. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Mali-G52 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 404 | 426 | # of Cores | 2 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 23.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 29.8 | 45.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 45.4 | 48.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 39.4 | 25.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 28.4 | 41.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 39.4 | 59.6 | Real Racing 3 | 56.6 | 85.2 | Sniper 3D | 71.8 | 107.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 71.8 | 58.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 72.1 | 70.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 59.8 | 58.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 22 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | LTE Cat.13 5CA/Cat.15 2CA | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 400 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3562 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 850 is better: 20 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Rockchip RK3562 SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Exynos 850 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523
| |
|