Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Unisoc SC9863A benchmark which processor is better

Tiger T310 vs SC9863A

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Unisoc SC9863A, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G71 MP2 and IMG8322.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Tiger T310 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and SC9863A is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A55). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications of the chipsets, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like PCMark, Neocore, GFXBench, PassMark, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Vellamo, Octane V2, GeekBench 6, 5, and how good the processors are in games Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Tiger T310 or SC9863A and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

 
Unisoc Tiger T310
Unisoc SC9863A

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Tiger T3107% SC9863A5%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Tiger T31064% SC9863A31%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Tiger T3104% SC9863A4%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Tiger T310 SC9863A
Total score10294873522
CPU2881820588
GPU3911927947
MEM1647111762
UX1853413228

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Tiger T310 SC9863A
Single-Core210190
Multi-Core926856

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Tiger T310 SC9863A
Frequency2000 MHz1600 MHz
Cores48
Bit6464
Lithography12 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration1x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75
3x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)5 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR4LPDDR3
Max. Memory8 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency1066933
Memory bandwidth1424
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache384 KB256 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache8 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tiger T310 is 19% better than SC9863A in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Tiger T310 has 4 more core than SC9863A. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G71 MP2IMG8322
GPU Frequency770 MHz510 MHz
GFloPS52.3146.2
# of Cores2128
# of Shader Units
Display2160 x 1080 pixels2160 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)23.715.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra38.526.9
Call of Duty: Mobile25.417.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)19.812.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition24.116.2
Real Racing 367.440.4
Sniper 3D61.643
Need for Speed No Limits61.637.7
Mortal Kombat X61.643
CSR Racing 242.432.3
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution16 MP16 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE-7LTE-4
Download speed300 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportYesNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T310 is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Unisoc SC9863A is better: 5
   You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Tiger T310 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
SC9863A SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Tiger T310 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio G35
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Kirin 710A
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Snapdragon 460
• Vs Exynos 9609
• Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Helio P70
• Vs Snapdragon 670
• Vs Snapdragon 665
• Vs Exynos 9611
• Vs Exynos 9610
• Vs Kirin 970
• Vs Helio P60
• Vs Helio P90
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Helio P95
• Vs Snapdragon 675
• Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Snapdragon 662
• Vs Snapdragon 710
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603


SC9863A SoC Comparisons
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands