MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) vs Unisoc Tiger T310

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) vs Unisoc Tiger T310, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T880 MP4 and Mali-G71 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio X25 (MT6797T) is deca-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Tiger T310 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A75). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as WebXPRT 3, PCMark, PassMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Geekbench, Neocore, Octane V2, and how good the processors are in games Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy Helio X25 (MT6797T) or Tiger T310 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Helio X25 (MT6797T)

Tiger T310

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Helio X25 (MT6797T)

41%

Tiger T310

64%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Helio X25 (MT6797T)

Tiger T310

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Helio X25 (MT6797T)	Tiger T310
Total score	93545	102948
CPU	26196	28818
GPU	35553	39119
MEM	14960	16471
UX	16833	18534

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Helio X25 (MT6797T)	Tiger T310
Single-Core	242	210
Multi-Core	1089	926

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Helio X25 (MT6797T)	Tiger T310
Frequency	2500 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	10	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	20 nm	12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.55 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	1x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 3x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Dual Channel)	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	4 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	1066
Memory bandwidth	14	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	32 KB	384 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X25 (MT6797T) is 19% better than Tiger T310 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Helio X25 (MT6797T) has -6 more core than Tiger T310. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T880 MP4	Mali-G71 MP2
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	770 MHz
GFloPS	115.51	52.3
# of Cores	4	2
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2160 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	19.8	23.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	34.9	38.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	21.1	25.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	16.4	19.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	20.3	24.1
Real Racing 3	61.1	67.4
Sniper 3D	66.3	61.6
Need for Speed No Limits	55.8	61.6
Mortal Kombat X	55.8	61.6
CSR Racing 2	41.9	42.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	16 MP
Dual Camera resolution		16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE-7
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) is better: 12
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T310 is better: 25
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Helio X25 (MT6797T) and Tiger T310, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Helio X25 (MT6797T) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Helio X25 (MT6797T) specs and review.

Tiger T310 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Tiger T310 specs and review.