|
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Samsung Exynos 850, compare of GPUs Mali-G52 MP6 and Mali-G71 MP2. This performance comparison includes two processors: Tiger T310 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A75) and Exynos 850 is octa-core (Cortex-A55). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Geekbench, Quadrant, PCMark, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock etc. After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chipset is better to buy Tiger T310 or Exynos 850 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreTiger T310 | 7% |
Exynos 850 | 8% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Tiger T310 | 64% |
Exynos 850 | 74% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingTiger T310 | 4% |
Exynos 850 | 5% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tiger T310 |
Exynos 850 | Total score | 102948 | 119144 | CPU | 28818 | 33358 | GPU | 39119 | 45266 | MEM | 16471 | 19058 | UX | 18534 | 21445 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tiger T310 |
Exynos 850 | Single-Core | 210 | 243 | Multi-Core | 926 | 1072 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tiger T310 |
Exynos 850 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 8 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 3x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1066 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 14 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 384 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Tiger T310 has 4 more core than Exynos 850. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G71 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 770 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 52.3 | 426 | # of Cores | 2 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 23.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 23.7 | 45.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 38.5 | 48.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 25.4 | 25.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 19.8 | 41.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 24.1 | 59.6 | Real Racing 3 | 67.4 | 85.2 | Sniper 3D | 61.6 | 107.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 61.6 | 58.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 61.6 | 70.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 42.4 | 58.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 22 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE-7 | LTE Cat.13 5CA/Cat.15 2CA | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 400 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T310 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 850 is better: 26 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Tiger T310 and Exynos 850, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Tiger T310 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Exynos 850 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|