Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc Tiger T310 benchmark which processor is better

Kirin 950 vs Tiger T310

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc Tiger T310, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T880 MP4 and Mali-G71 MP2.

   This performance comparison includes two processors: Kirin 950 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Tiger T310 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A75). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.

   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications like Neocore, Octane V2, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, 3DMark, and how good the chipsets are in games Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock etc.

   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Kirin 950 or Tiger T310 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.


 
HiSilicon Kirin 950
Unisoc Tiger T310

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Kirin 9507% Tiger T3107%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Kirin 95048% Tiger T31064%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Kirin 9506% Tiger T3104%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Kirin 950 Tiger T310
Total score100285102948
CPU2807328818
GPU3810239119
MEM1604416471
UX1804618534

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Kirin 950 Tiger T310
Single-Core265210
Multi-Core902926

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Kirin 950 Tiger T310
Frequency2300 MHz2000 MHz
Cores84
Bit6464
Lithography16 nm12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A72
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
1x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75
3x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)5 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR4xLPDDR4
Max. Memory4 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency16001066
Memory bandwidth25.614
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache384 KB
L2 cache2 MB
L3 cache8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8.2-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 950 is 13% better than Tiger T310 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Kirin 950 has -4 more core than Tiger T310. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T880 MP4Mali-G71 MP2
GPU Frequency900 MHz770 MHz
GFloPS122.3152.3
# of Cores42
# of Shader Units
Display2560 x 1600 pixels2160 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)22.323.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra38.738.5
Call of Duty: Mobile25.525.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)19.119.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition24.324.1
Real Racing 348.467.4
Sniper 3D61.961.6
Need for Speed No Limits54.261.6
Mortal Kombat X61.961.6
CSR Racing 242.642.4
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution20 MP16 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE-7
Download speed300 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoYes
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 950 is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T310 is better: 19
   You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Kirin 950 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
Tiger T310 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10


Kirin 950 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Helio G35
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Kirin 710A
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Snapdragon 460
• Vs Exynos 9609
• Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Helio P70
• Vs Snapdragon 670
• Vs Snapdragon 665
• Vs Exynos 9611
• Vs Exynos 9610
• Vs Kirin 970
• Vs Helio P60
• Vs Helio P90
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Helio P95
• Vs Snapdragon 675
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs SC9863A
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290


Tiger T310 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio G35
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Kirin 710A
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Snapdragon 460
• Vs Exynos 9609
• Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Helio P70
• Vs Snapdragon 670
• Vs Snapdragon 665
• Vs Exynos 9611
• Vs Exynos 9610
• Vs Kirin 970
• Vs Helio P60
• Vs Helio P90
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Helio P95
• Vs Snapdragon 675
• Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Snapdragon 662
• Vs Snapdragon 710
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs SC9863A
• Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands