Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 benchmark which processor is better

Exynos 7 Octa 7884 vs Snapdragon 670

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, speed examination of GPUs Adreno 615 and Mali-G71 MP18.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 7 Octa 7884 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Snapdragon 670 is octa-core (Kryo 360). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like PCMark, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Octane V2, GFXBench, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, Geekbench, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, and how good the CPUs are in games PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.

After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Exynos 7 Octa 7884 or Snapdragon 670 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 7 Octa 7884

Snapdragon 670

10%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 7 Octa 7884

57%

Snapdragon 670

66%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 7 Octa 7884

Snapdragon 670

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 7 Octa 7884	Snapdragon 670
Total score	116251	151765
CPU	32549	42500
GPU	44170	57660
MEM	18591	24290
UX	20926	27322

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 7 Octa 7884	Snapdragon 670
Single-Core	337	311
Multi-Core	1046	1306

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 7 Octa 7884	Snapdragon 670
Frequency	1600 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 6x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	8x2.0 GHz Kryo 360
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR4	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	8 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866	1866
Memory bandwidth	24	14.9
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	384 KB	256 KB
L2 cache	512 KB
L3 cache	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 670 is 19% better than Exynos 7 Octa 7884 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G71 MP18	Adreno 615
GPU Frequency	546 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	334	448
# of Cores	18
# of Shader Units		256
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	3840 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	23.7	28.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	44.6	27.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	47.3	54.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	25.3	29.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	40.7	22.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	58.9	38.7
Real Racing 3	82.8	95.7
Sniper 3D	61.5	103.9
Need for Speed No Limits	66.2	65.6
Mortal Kombat X	75.7	71.1
CSR Racing 2	66.2	60.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	28 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution	28 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 160
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	LTE Cat.13 3CA	Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed	600 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou	Galileo, Beidou, SBAS, GLONASS, QZSS, GPS
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 is better: 19
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 and Snapdragon 670, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Exynos 7 Octa 7884 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Exynos 7 Octa 7884 specs and review.

Snapdragon 670 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Snapdragon 670 specs and review.