 |
Allwinner A523 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 |
|
Comparisons 13-06-2023 Comprehensive compare data of Allwinner A523 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as 3DMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, GFXBench, PCMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, PassMark, Neocore, and how good the chips are in games PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy A523 or Exynos 7 Octa 7884.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreA523 | 12% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | 8% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)A523 | 53% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | 57% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingA523 | 9% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | 5% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | A523 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | Total score | 167563 | 116251 | CPU | 46909 | 32549 | GPU | 63678 | 44170 | MEM | 26807 | 18591 | UX | 30170 | 20926 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | A523 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | Single-Core | 796 | 337 | Multi-Core | 3186 | 1046 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | A523 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | Frequency | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 6x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | DDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4 up to 2400MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 1 MB | 384 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 16 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A523 is 11% better than Exynos 7 Octa 7884 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC1 2EE | Mali-G71 MP18 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 546 MHz | GFloPS | 540 | 334 | # of Cores | 3 | 18 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 21.4 | 23.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 26.5 | 44.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 56.9 | 47.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 29.5 | 25.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 23.8 | 40.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 32.7 | 58.9 | Real Racing 3 | 98.9 | 82.8 | Sniper 3D | 73.8 | 61.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 79.9 | 66.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 73.7 | 75.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 79.3 | 66.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 28 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 28 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | LTE Cat.13 3CA | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A523 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 is better: 17 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
A523 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 SoC Comparisons • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|