|
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 vs Snapdragon 460 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, compare of GPUs Mali-G71 MP18 and Adreno 610. This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 7 Octa 7884 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Snapdragon 460 is octa-core (Kryo 240). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like Mozilla Kraken, Geekbench, PassMark, Quadrant, PCMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Neocore, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, and how good the processors are in games Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Exynos 7 Octa 7884 or Snapdragon 460 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreExynos 7 Octa 7884 | 8% |
Snapdragon 460 | 10% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | 57% |
Snapdragon 460 | 69% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingExynos 7 Octa 7884 | 5% |
Snapdragon 460 | 8% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 7 Octa 7884 |
Snapdragon 460 | Total score | 116251 | 142955 | CPU | 32549 | 40022 | GPU | 44170 | 54316 | MEM | 18591 | 22868 | UX | 20926 | 25725 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 7 Octa 7884 |
Snapdragon 460 | Single-Core | 337 | 292 | Multi-Core | 1046 | 1286 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 7 Octa 7884 |
Snapdragon 460 | Frequency | 1600 MHz | 1800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 11 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 6x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 8x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 3 W | Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 13.91 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 384 KB | | L2 cache | 512 KB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.3-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 460 is 11% better than Exynos 7 Octa 7884 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G71 MP18 | Adreno 610 | GPU Frequency | 546 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 334 | 312 | # of Cores | 18 | | # of Shader Units | | 192 | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 23.7 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 44.6 | 28.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 47.3 | 40.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 25.3 | 37.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 40.7 | 27.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 58.9 | 40.2 | Real Racing 3 | 82.8 | 70.2 | Sniper 3D | 61.5 | 88.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 66.2 | 72.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 75.7 | 64.2 | CSR Racing 2 | 66.2 | 48.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 28 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 28 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 340 | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE Cat.13 3CA | Qualcomm Snapdragon X11 LTE modem | Download speed | 600 MBit/s. | 390 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GLONASS, NavIC, QZSS, GPS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, Galileo | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 is better: 20
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 is better: 18 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 SoC Comparisons • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562
Snapdragon 460 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|